Skip Ribbon Commands
Skip to main content

Skip Navigation LinksAutonomous-shipping Autonomous shipping

Skip Navigation LinksIMO / English / Media Centre / In Focus / Autonomous shipping

Autonomous shipping

 

 

IMO is currently assessing existing IMO instruments to see how they might apply to ships with varying degrees of automation, through a regulatory scoping exercise on Maritime Autonomous Surface Ships (MASS).

 Why has IMO decided to look at the regulation of autonomous ships?

​IMO's Strategic Plan (2018-2023) has a key Strategic Direction to "Integrate new and advancing technologies in the regulatory framework". This involves balancing the benefits derived from new and advancing technologies against safety and security concerns, the impact on the environment and on international trade facilitation, the potential costs to the industry, and finally their impact on personnel, both on board and ashore.

In 2017, following a proposal by a number of Member States, IMO's Maritime Safety Committee (MSC) agreed to include the issue of marine autonomous surface ships on its agenda. This would be in the form of a scoping exercise to determine how the safe, secure and environmentally sound operation of Maritime Autonomous Surface Ships (MASS) may be introduced in IMO instruments.

The MSC recognized that IMO should take a proactive and leading role, given the rapid technological developments relating to the introduction of commercially operated ships in autonomous mode (operating without crew). 

IMO's Legal and Facilitation Committees have also included the regulatory scoping exercise on their agendas, for conventions coming under the purview of those committees.

 

The scoping exercise is seen as a starting point and is expected to touch on an extensive range of issues, including the human element, safety, security, liability and compensation for damage, interactions with ports, pilotage, responses to incidents and protection of the marine environment.  


 The aim is to complete the scoping exercise by 2020.

 Are there already autonomous ships in operation?

Autonomous and remote-controlled ships are being trialled in some sea areas.

Most predictions are that autonomous or semi-autonomous operation would be limited to short voyages, for example from one specific port to another, across a short distance.

Presentations on autonomous shipping made during a special a special session (2018) of IMO’s Maritime Safety Committee 100th session can be downloaded here.

 Interim guidelines for trials of autonomous ships

The Maritime Safety Committee (MSC), 101 session, in June 2019 approved Interim guidelines for Maritime Autonomous Surface Ships (MASS)  trials. 

Among other things, the guidelines say that trials should be conducted in a manner that provides at least the same degree of safety, security and protection of the environment as provided by the relevant instruments. Risks associated with the trials should be appropriately identified and measures to reduce the risks, to as low as reasonably practicable and acceptable, should be put in place.

Onboard or remote operators of MASS should be appropriately qualified for operating MASS subject to the trial. Any personnel involved in MASS trials, whether remote or onboard, should be appropriately qualified and experienced to safely conduct MASS trials. Appropriate steps should be taken to ensure sufficient cyber risk management of the systems and infrastructure used when conducting MASS trials.

 What is the methodology for the scoping exercise?

​The framework and methodology for the MSC's regulatory scoping exercise on Maritime Autonomous Surface Ships (MASS) was approved by MSC 100. The Legal Committee has decided to follow the same approach as MSC and a slightly adjusted framework and methodology for the LEG’s regulatory scoping exercise was approved by LEG 106. The Facilitation Committee (FAL 43) agreed a similar process. 

For each instrument related to maritime safety and security, and to liability and compensation, and for each degree of autonomy, provisions will be identified which:

  • apply to MASS and prevent MASS operations; or
  • apply to MASS and do not prevent MASS operations and require no actions; or
  • apply to MASS and do not prevent MASS operations but may need to be amended or clarified, and/or may contain gaps; or
  • have no application to MASS operations.

The degrees of autonomy identified for the purpose of the scoping exercise are:

  • Degree one: Ship with automated processes and decision support: Seafarers are on board to operate and control shipboard systems and functions. Some operations may be automated and at times be unsupervised but with seafarers on board ready to take control.
  • Degree two: Remotely controlled ship with seafarers on board: The ship is controlled and operated from another location. Seafarers are available on board to take control and to operate the shipboard systems and functions.
  • Degree three: Remotely controlled ship without seafarers on board: The ship is controlled and operated from another location. There are no seafarers on board.
  • Degree four: Fully autonomous ship: The operating system of the ship is able to make decisions and determine actions by itself.

Once the first step is completed, a second step will be conducted to analyse and determine the most appropriate way of addressing MASS operations, taking into account, inter alia, human element, technology and operational factors. The analysis will identify the need for:

  • Equivalences as provided for by the instruments or developing interpretations; and/or
  • Amending existing instruments; and/or
  • Developing new instruments; or
  • None of the above as a result of the analysis.

The aim is to complete the regulatory scoping exercise in 2020.

 Which treaties are being looked at?

Maritime Safety Committee (MSC)

The list of instruments to be covered in the MSC’s scoping exercise for MASS includes those covering:

  • safety and maritime security (SOLAS); 
  • collision regulations (COLREG); 
  • loading and stability (Load Lines); 
  • training of seafarers and fishers (STCW, STCW-F); 
  • search and rescue (SAR); 
  • tonnage measurement (Tonnage Convention); Safe Containers (CSC); and 
  • special trade passenger ship instruments (SPACE STP, STP).

Facilitation Committee

The Facilitation Committee is considering the Convention on Facilitation of International Maritime Traffic (FAL Convention).

Legal Committee

The list of instruments to be covered in the Legal Committee's scoping exercise for MASS  include: 

Conventions under the purview of the Legal Committee:

  • BUNKERS 2001 – International Convention on Civil Liability for Bunker Oil Pollution Damage, 2001. 
  • CLC 1969 – International Convention on Civil Liability for Oil Pollution Damage, 1969.
  • CLC PROT 1976 – Protocol of 1976 to amend the International Convention on Civil Liability for Oil Pollution Damage, 1969.
  • CLC PROT 1992 – Protocol of 1992 to amend the International Convention on Civil Liability for Oil Pollution Damage, 1969. 
  • FUND PROT 1992 – Protocol of 1992 to amend the International Convention on the Establishment of an International Fund for Compensation for Oil Pollution Damage, 1971.
  • FUND PROT 2003 – Protocol of 2003 to the International Convention on the Establishment of an International Fund for Compensation for Oil Pollution Damage, 1992.
  • NUCLEAR 1971 – Convention relating to Civil Liability in the Field of Maritime Carriage of Nuclear Material, 1971. 
  • PAL 1974 – Athens Convention relating to the Carriage of Passengers and Their Luggage by Sea, 1974. 
  • PAL PROT 1976 – Protocol of 1976 to the Athens Convention relating to the Carriage of Passengers and Their Luggage by Sea, 1974. 
  • PAL PROT 2002 – Protocol of 2002 to the Athens Convention relating to the Carriage of Passengers and Their Luggage by Sea, 1974. 
  • LLMC 1976 – Convention on Limitation of Liability for Maritime Claims, 1976.
  • LLMC PROT 1996 – Protocol of 1996 to amend the Convention on Limitation of Liability for Maritime Claims, 1976. 
  • SUA 1988 – Convention for the Suppression of Unlawful Acts against the Safety of Maritime Navigation, 1988. 
  • SUA PROT 1988 – Protocol for the Suppression of Unlawful Acts against the Safety of Fixed Platforms Located on the Continental Shelf, 1988. 
  • SUA 2005 – Protocol of 2005 to the Convention for the Suppression of Unlawful Acts against the Safety of Maritime Navigation. 
  • SUA PROT 2005 – Protocol of 2005 to the Protocol for the Suppression of Unlawful Acts against the Safety of Fixed Platforms Located on the Continental Shelf. 
  • SALVAGE 1989 – International Convention on Salvage, 1989.
  • NAIROBI WRC 2007 – Nairobi International Convention on the Removal of Wrecks, 2007.
  • HNS PROT 2010 – Protocol of 2010 to the International Convention on Liability and Compensation for Damage in Connection with the Carriage of Hazardous and Noxious Substances by Sea, 1996.

Conventions emanating from the Legal Committee, with shared cognizance with other IMO committees

  • INTERVENTION 1969 – International Convention relating to Intervention on the High Seas in Cases of Oil Pollution Casualties, 1969.
  • INTERVENTION PROT 1973 – Protocol relating to Intervention on the High Seas in Cases of Pollution by Substances other than Oil, 1973.

Joint treaties with IMO and other UN bodies, emanating from the Legal Committee 

  • International Convention on Maritime Liens and Mortgages, 1993 (joint with UNCTAD).
  • International Convention on Arrest of Ships, 1999 (joint with UNCTAD).