BLG Sub-Committee agrees technical proposals for reduction of air pollution from ships
Draft amendments
to revise the MARPOL regulations on the prevention of air pollution from ships
were agreed by the IMO Sub-Committee on Bulk Liquids and Gases (BLG) when it
met last week (4-8 February) for its 12th session.
Following
lengthy and technically challenging discussions in the Air Pollution Working
Group, the Sub-Committee agreed a draft revised Annex VI to the MARPOL Convention
and amendments to the NOx Technical Code. These will now be submitted to the
Marine Environment Protection Committee (MEPC), which meets for its 57th session
from 31 March to 4 April 2008.
A number
of options remain open for discussion at the MEPC, which is expected to approve
the amendments prior to their formal adoption at MEPC 58 (6 to 10 October 2008).
The amendments would then enter into force, under the tacit acceptance procedure,
16 months later, in March 2010, or on a date to be decided by the MEPC.
SOx and PM emissions
from ships
Given
the significant environmental, human health, and economic consequences of a
decision on how best to further reduce emissions of sulphur oxide (SOx) and
particulate matter (PM) from ships, the Sub-Committee felt it appropriate that
relevant policy decisions should be taken at the Committee level and that its
principal duty was to "set the table" for such discussions.
The comprehensive
report by the informal Cross Government/Industry Scientific Group of Experts,
established, following an initiative by IMO Secretary-General Efthimios E. Mitropoulos,
to evaluate the effects of the different fuel options proposed under the revision
of MARPOL Annex VI, together with the outcome of the intersessional meeting
of the Air Pollution Working Group held in Berlin in October/November 2007,
enabled the BLG Sub-Committee to make significant progress.
The Working
Group was tasked with reviewing the six options under consideration and, following
extensive discussion in the group, the BLG Sub-Committee agreed to reduce the
six options to just three, representing an equitable and fair compression of
the different concepts and proposals under consideration by the Organization,
as described below (the figures in square brackets remain open for further consideration
by the MEPC):
Option 1 Global
1.00% (10,000 ppm)* fuel standard applied globally in [2012]
0.50% (5,000 ppm) fuel standard applied globally in [2015]
Option 2 Global
/ Regional
Global cap remains unchanged at 4.50% (45,000 ppm)
Emission Control Areas require 0.10% (1,000 ppm) standard in [2012]
Option 3 Global
/ Regional with Micro-Areas
Global cap is lowered to 3.00% (30,000 ppm) in [2012]
Emission Control Area standard lowered to 1.00% (10,000 ppm) in [2010]
Emission
Control Area standard lowered to 0.50% (5,000 ppm) in [2015]
Micro-Emission Control Areas may be established at a distance of no more than
24 nautical miles from the baseline with a 0.10% (1,000 ppm) standard. A proposal
for such Micro-Emission Control Areas must be submitted to the IMO for review,
but are to be subject to a relaxed set of criteria.
* The
respective parts per million (ppm) and corresponding percentages all refer to
maximum sulphur content limits.
These
three options have now been put forward by the Sub-Committee to the MEPC. It
was noted that the respective implementation dates, control levels, and concepts
outlined in the above options would all be subject to debate and modification
and that nothing precluded the development of a hybrid proposal.
A concern
was raised over whether sufficient quantities of compliant fuel would be available
to support the options as presented. As initially presented, all options would
require significant changes in product output from many refineries around the
world, with some options representing an unprecedented single step regulatory
change compared to the changes that have driven global fuel markets in the past
decade.
Particular
attention was drawn to the need to maintain the production link between marine
fuel and land-based fuel with respect to specifications around the world and
to adopt a phased approach such that refinery and supply configurations could
be adapted, in response to market signals, to ensure continued availability
and supply without major disruption.
A number
of other matters were also addressed, including finalization of draft exhaust
gas cleaning guidelines and wash water discharge criteria for such systems,
to be forwarded to MEPC for discussion and possible adoption by the Committee.
It was, however, decided not to recommend that a market-based instrument or
trials for such instruments be included in the amendments to Annex VI.
NOx regulations
for new engines
The Sub-Committee
further developed the three-tier structure for new engines, which would set
progressively tighter nitrogen oxide (NOx) emission standards for new engines
depending on the date of their installation. Tier I represents the 17 g/kW standard
stipulated in the existing Annex VI.
For Tier
II, it was agreed to recommend a standard that would see NOx emission levels
for new engines installed from 1 January 2011 reduced by a figure of between
15.5 per cent and 21.8 per cent, depending on the engine's operating parameters.
With regard
to Tier III, a number of delegations expressed the view that a geographically
based approach requiring significant reductions in designated Emission Control
Areas (ECAs), should be introduced. Such an approach, it was felt, would provide
a global framework for reducing NOx emissions in coastal areas with the most
severe problems, while allowing operation at the Tier II level outside the designated
Emission Control Areas. It was also noted that this approach would offer significant
protection of the environment and human health, while avoiding the increased
fuel consumption that is associated with less advanced NOx reduction technologies.
The recommended
Tier III standard, applicable to new builds beginning on 1 January 2016, will,
therefore, see a reduction of 80 per cent from Tier I levels in specific emission
control areas designated through IMO. The Organization will develop guidelines
for the designation of such areas, taking into account the environmental impact.
The meeting noted that engine manufacturers in Japan are already developing
advanced engine treatment systems to meet the proposed Tier III standard.
NOx standards
for existing engines
The working
group reviewed the issue of whether it was appropriate and feasible to establish
a standard applicable to pre-2000 marine diesel engine installations. While
a wide range of opinion exists on the question of whether such a standard is
appropriate and practical, many delegations felt that insufficient information
and studies had been submitted to inform such a decision. It was, therefore,
agreed that further information and consideration of this matter will be necessary
at MEPC 57.
NOx Technical
Code
With
respect to the NOx Technical Code, earlier debates concerning the certification
of serially produced engines, direct measurement and monitoring methods, a draft
certification procedure for existing engines, and test cycles to be applied
to Tier II and Tier III engines, were resolved. Among other things, it was agreed
that it should be left to the Administration to decide whether serially produced
engines will be required to be certified individually, and that each engine
should be accompanied throughout its life installed on a ship, while under the
authority of a given Administration, by a certificate demonstrating its conformity
as part of a generic engine family certification or a certificate issued for
that single engine.
Draft text
for chapter 6.4 of the NOx Technical Code concerning direct measurement and
monitoring was further developed and agreed, and test cycles to be applied for
the Tier II and Tier III NOx standards were also agreed. It was, however, recognized
that the test cycle and respective load points may be revisited in the future,
if necessary.
Speaking
at the close of the session, Secretary-General Mitropoulos highlighted the importance
of this work for the wider maritime community and for the environment and praised
the working group for "successfully conducting strenuous negotiations into
the small hours during the week, in order to build a consensus reconciling the
various positions."
He told delegates
"draft amendments to MARPOL Annex VI and the NOx Technical Code can now
go forward to the Committee, for it to make the sound and well-informed decisions
- with the benefit of your advice and within the agreed timelines - that the
international maritime community so eagerly expects and the environment deserves."
He urged all IMO Members to reconvene at MEPC 57 with the high resolve and enthusiasm
that had been shown throughout this meeting, so that, "the IMO spirit of
co-operation may prevail and facilitate the fulfilment of the goals we have
so diligently pursued since 2005, when the revision process was set in motion."
Briefing
02, 12 February 2008
For further
information please contact:
Lee Adamson, Head, Public Information Services on 020 7587 3153 (media@imo.org)
or
Natasha Brown, External Relations Officer on 020 7587 3274 (media@imo.org).
|